Much has been written about cultural change and how much effort – and time – it takes. If we think of culture as a sort of aggregate of the behaviours of a group of people and the values they (claim to) espouse and live by, you can see why the case for the argument is plausible: behavioural change takes longer than process or systems change, as it is human beings that must be changed rather than flow charts, the screens of an interface, or the internal logic of a computer program. None of these things actively resist change, offer an opinion on its impact or offer an emotional or psychological response.
There’s an interesting argument against Artificial Intelligence there somewhere, and one that prompts flashbacks to Hal, the troublesome computer in Space Odyssey. Hal has the binary equivalent of a breakdown when it tries to faithfully complete conflicting tasks, which should provide some kind of lesson to process designers everywhere … In reality – and I nearly typed ‘of course’, but then again … – we are neither controlled by our computers nor driven by icy logic. Well, most of us anyway. (For some disturbing surveys about sociopathy in business, read an earlier blog. Not that we’re excusing anyone …)











